Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing since 1989
-----
QQ-Z-325
Should we be using this standard or should we use B633-98- - -I've read 325 was replaced by 633- -so we should adapt to 633 and rid ourselves of 325. . . correct or not?..thank you.
Ron WerkheiserAlumitek - Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, USA
2005
The cancellation notice for QQ-Z-325, dated March 9, 1982, says
"Federal Specification QQ-Z-325C, dated August 18, 1976, is hereby canceled. An existing commercial standard which covers this material is American Society for Materials and Testing Standard
ASTM B633."
So it's not a hard supercession, meaning that your customers really should make a decision based on looking at the two documents. It would probably be easier to do if ASSIST posted the canceled QQ-Z-325 on the website, but they don't. My company has decided to use B633 as a direct replacement, but what others do is up to them.
Lee Gearhart
metallurgist - E. Aurora, New York
2005
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread