No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Semi-Bright Nickel/Chrome Electroplating Problem




2005

semi-bright Nickel / Chrome on brushed brass substrate.

Typically we have less than 1% reject rate.

We performed a routine, yearly pump out on our semi-bright nickel bath.....as we do every year without a problem.

Upon start up we had a problem with poor chrome coverage. In the area of poor chrome coverage, the LCD area.......the nickel was very thin. The reject rate was 20-30%...very unusual for us. We were able to rechrome most of the parts....but really affecting our first pass yield. We were able to successfully plate once we decreased our production and increased the amperage.

ALL Chemistries appeared fine and were verified by our supplier. We thought there was an electrical issue because the one thing that was found at the pump out, was one of the two coils in this large, dual station tank, had been plating. We checked this out and installed new di-electric unions. Now...we wonder if it is an unusual organic problem, as the Hull Cells indicate no problem. When doing a 2 amp / 10 minute panel in the lab.....with an 'as is' and a carbon peroxide treat....we did find that the thickness of nickel was more on the panel that had been carbon treated. We started changing the filter more frequently with extra carbon (we do continuous carbon filtration). This seems to be helping. We are still running higher than normal amperages, but we have been back to our normal load size (normal production).

I would like some other opinions or thoughts, if anyone has some. It is so frustrating when something bites you and you are not 100% sure what it is, and, sometimes, it disappears on it's own and you never learn from it!

Thanks......

Gloria Schwedler
Captive Plating Shop - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA



Hello Gloria,

A sluggish plating rate seems to be a contamination problem.

A mentor in this field once cleared out a similar problem in my bright Nickel, that is we added 0.1 gms per litre of Silver Sulphate in the Nickel bath.

No harm in trying it out.

Khozem Vahaanwala
Khozem Vahaanwala
Saify Ind
supporting advertiser
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
saify logo
2005



2005

Contamination, try to "clean" the electrolyte by using folded steel sheets and very low current.

Make sure that the sulphate content in the chrome solution is below 0,75 grams/liter. It affects the throwing power really much.

Roger Larsson
- Sweden




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"