No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Quality Issue: Brushing Buffed Brass and Nickel Plated Plastic Surfaces




I am currently working on a quality issue with brushing, buffed brass and nickel plated plastic components. This is a manual operation. The quality issue is what I call an incomplete brushed part (small/large spots of unbrushed surface area). Our inspection method consists of a simple visual inspect by operators and quality personnel. This has proven to be inefficient. Are there any other methods for detecting the unbrushed areas or anything that can be used as a visual aid, to increase the detection of non-uniform brushing? Automated brushing is not an option at this time, so the human factor is relevant. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

Zach Robertson
Industrial - Sheridan , Arkansas, United States
2005



Many have tried and failed to quantify cosmetic appearance. Beauty, they say, is in the eye of the beholder. The best method is to prepare samples of acceptable and non-acceptable appearance which operators and inspectors can refer to so they're all singing from the same music.

jeffrey holmes
Jeffrey Holmes, CEF
Spartanburg, South Carolina
2005


Thanks for the reply. I was afraid that would be the outcome. It is very hard to develop a standard for something that you cannot quantify. We can say that part "x" is a bad part, but then the question of "how bad is it?", will arise. Without a standard how do you know that part "y" is or is not better than part "x"? Thanks again for the reply.

Zach Robertson
- Sheridan, Arkansas, United States
2005



You will need a number of samples, showing what is acceptable and what is not.

jeffrey holmes
Jeffrey Holmes, CEF
Spartanburg, South Carolina
2005



Zach,

I'm working in the decorative plating industry and I feel your pain. I've found that a nice wall of parts, brightly lit in your final inspection area showing "barely acceptable" quality is about as good as we could do. Things still slip through the cracks once and awhile as new problems arise. Add 'em to the wall and go on. It's a simple "Hey if it's no worse than this, it is acceptable" wall.

Good luck

Trent Kaufman
Trent Kaufman
electroplater - Galva, Illinois
2005


finishing.com is made possible by ...
m&m metallizing banner2



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"