No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

citric acid Passivation on SUS430




Hi,

May I know what's the different between SUS303 & SUS430? Which is more suitable for citric acid passivation? When using citric acid passivation on SUS430, hard particle:Al/O, Si/O, Si/C & Al/O are detected. But passivate on SUS303, there is no hard particle detected. Anyone know why?

OOI HK
USM - Sungai Dua, Penang, Malaysia
2004



303 Stainless steel is a free machining form of austenitic steel, while 430 is a ferritic grade, quite different. If you look at the charts you will see that the 303 is a much "better" grade of steel, but contains 0.15% sulfur, which can cause major problems in cleaning and passivation no matter whether you use nitric or citric passivation.

Both of these grades can be readily passivated with citric acid based formulations. Both should be pretreated with alkaline cleaner (especially the 303 to remove the sulfur).

You would have to explain more about "hard particles" of AlO, SiO, SiC being present. These particles are likely from the polishing or cutting process.

lee kremer
lee kremer sig
Lee Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner
2004


Hi,

Thanks for your opinion. Sure, I would like to talk more detail about the hard particle. We used water extraction on the passivated part. After this we collected the residue from the water by filtration and the filter paper analysing by SEM/EDX. The hard particle detected are Al/O, Si/C, Si/O and Cr/O. I don't understand what is wrong with the result. As what you say, the part had gone through pretreatment by alkaline cleaner before citric acid passivation but without nitric acid. Do you think this is the key point why hard particle detected. May I know what is the function or purpose add in nitric acid before passivation? If the particle come from polishing or cutting process, why it wouldn't remove by pretreatment or passivation? Is it the two not good enough to remove it?

Thank you for your valuable opinion.

OOI HK
- Sungai Dua, Penang, Malaysia
2004



2005

The only way you can get these oxide particles left on the surface is if the surface was not cleaned properly and/or the surface is fairly rough (rough by comparison to the size of the particles you are finding). The particles could be hiding in the rough surface until you do the water extraction.

430ss is not a very corrosion resistant steel, but can be hardened nicely to 60-65 Rockwell, which makes it good for many applications. The surface is not nearly as good as with the 303 after the same treatment, but it is much harder.

lee kremer
lee kremer sig
Lee Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"