What hardness/abrasion resistance from anodizing?

A. You can not get a true Rockwell hardness on anodize, You need a microhardness which you can only partially equate to a Rockwell. Reason, the anodize layer is a ceramic and the aluminum will give way enough, causing the ceramic coating to fracture and give you a low reading. If you would tell us what you intend to use this added hardness for, someone(S) might be able to give you an idea of what would work or options.

Taber Abrasion Tester

on eBay or

Amazon

(affil links)

A. Although Rockwell is not typically used in measuring hardness (normally, one would use a Taber abrader) on an anodized surface,you can expect 60-65 Rockwell on a decent hardcoat.

A. To paraphrase from Wernick Pinner and Sheasby:

The usual methods for testing hardness, like Brinell or Vickers, isn't applicable because the give the hardness of the basis metal. They then go on to say that there are complications using Rockwell as well, and that the most appropriate methods are tests of abrasion resistance.

All that being said, the final abrasion resistance is affected by a bunch of different factors, most of which will be controlled by your anodizer, but alloy selection plays a part as well.

If everything is done correctly, and you choose an alloy that performs particularly well, the final abrasion resistance can exceed that of tool steel.

Mind you though - I'm a type II anodizer, not a hardcoater. My understanding may be a bit off, someone else on this site may be better able to answer.

Now, if you had a question about bulk anodizing of fasteners...

A. Pretty much all of the above plus the temperature of the acid bath as well. When anodizing in sulfuric acid there are two competing processes going on - the oxide coating is building due to the electricity being applied to the parts, and the oxide coating is being dissolved due to the action of the electrolyte. Factors that discourage the dissolution would favor hardness; this would include lower temperatures, lower acid concentrations, higher current densities...

Also, alloy selection is going to play a role as well, but I'm not certain which alloys end up harder than the others.

One last variable, sealing the part decreases hardness - but is necessary if you are going to dye the part.

With regard to specifications, the most often referenced anodizing spec is MIL-A-8625 / MIL-PRF-8625 [on DLA] which specifies an abrasion resistance test as follows:
"4.5.5 Abrasion resistance. Test specimens, prepared In accordance with 4.3.3.2.4, shall be tested in accordance with Method 6192.1 of FED-STD-141 using CS-17 wheels with a 1000 gram load. The wheels shall revolve on the anodic coating at a speed of 70 revolutions per minute (RPM) for 10,000 cycles. The abrasion wheels shall be refaced at least once every 10,000 cycles. The wear index shall be determined after the 10,000 cycle period by dividing the weight loss by 10. The wear index shall meet the requirements of 3.7.2.2."

But it doesn't specify hardness test per se.

Good luck.

A. Mark, a quick Google search led to this on 6063 Aluminum; if it's important to you, looks like the paper can be purchased.

http://utpedia.utp.edu.my/3822/

Matweb has a plethora of information, but nothing on the wear index. However it does have hardness values, which I'm sure can be compared with the hardness value of your typical hardcoat in order to get a feel for the improvement you'd see by hard anodizing.

https://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet.aspx?MatGUID=1b8c06d0ca7c456694c7777d9e10be5b

Obviously, by itself, aluminum is not the hardest of metals, with improvements being made by alloying it with Si, Zn, Cr, etc, etc. And of course, heat treating processes, and cryogenics processes can also be done to change the hardness values.