No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

LM24 versus LM2 for chrome plating





I am a quality engineer working in the automotive industry we are currently experiencing a high reject rate of chrome plated aluminium parts (LM24)due mainly from porousity in the casting. Would changing the base metal to LM2 give a better casting? and will LM2 plate as good as LM24?

Robert Turton
automotive - Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
2004


2004

Robert, Can you tell us more about the LM alloy buy the differents bettwen this aluminium alloy content's. To plate on casting alloys the problem is always the silicon contents. But if your plating shop use a chrome solution type SRHS or a Sargent's solution I can't not se any problem with that. But it easy'r to solve you questin if we have the alloy content's.

Regards

Anders Sundman
Anders Sundman
4th Generation Surface Engineering
Consultant - Arvika,
Sweden




2005

Dear Anders

Sorry for delay with my response, we are still experiencing a high reject rate up to 80% after polishing and plating this is mainly due to the part design and high finish requirement. That is why we wanted to try a different material.
Currently we are using LM24
Cu 3-4 Mg 0.3max Si 7.5-9.5 Fe 1.3max Mn 0.5max Ni0.5 max
Zn3.0max Pb 0.3max Sn 0.2max Ti 0.2max Cr 0
Possible replacement LM2
Cu 0.7-2.5 Mg 0.3max Si 9.0-11.5 Fe 1.0max Mn 0.5max Ni0.5 max
Zn2.0max Pb 0.3max Sn 0.2max Ti 0.2max Cr 0
Do you think this could be an improvement ?

My plater does not know what chrome solution type SRHS or Sargent's solution is?
regards

Robert Turton
- UK


2005

Sergeant's chrome plating solution is also known as "conventional" chrome plating or "100:1" bath, Robert. This is the oldest of the chrome plating solutions and it uses sulphate as the catalyst in the ratio of 1 part of sulfuric acid to 100 parts of chromic acid.

Alternately to sulphate, or more likely in addition to it, fluoride catalysts can be used. The fluoride can be a very sparingly soluble material that, at least in theory, will dissolve into the plating bath at the correct ratio, with the excess precipitating as a sludge. This is known as SRHS or self regulating high speed. Good luck.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"