data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609bf/609bf7ec06bf67551c64cf7db86c75e1b2429ebb" alt="ted_yosem"
Curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e2f/26e2f7d702dd7be41aa0820ea5caf290b7b90d67" alt="finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry"
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing 1989-2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f77c/5f77ca5bdcdc1dd640bc1c826f3906846739a5b0" alt="mfhotline"
-----
Cadmium/zinc interaction between mating connectors
I am a project engineer at a large defense firm. I have been asked by the procurement department if a vendor can substitue a cadmium finish on a printed wiring board connector in lieu of the zinc finish that is specified. The mating connector has a zinc finish. I want to know if I will experience a galvanic reaction between the two finishes, and how severe it may be. I do not know the composition of the connectors base material.
Stephen Hivnordefense electronics - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
2004
Adding cadmium to any specification nowadays is a questionable action. I have no direct experience mating these zinc and cadmium surfaces but suspect it would not be a highly active galvanic couple.
Have you considered other alternatives? Perhaps a Zn-Ni alloy plate would accomplish what you want. Out of simple curiousity, why do you feel a need to switch to a cad-plate on this connector?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15a17/15a17f0b934ea795e494ba7f142dd4df2d0cb420" alt="Thomas Hanlon"
Thomas Hanlon, Materials Engineer
aerospace finishing - East Hartford, Connecticut, USA
2004
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread