No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Too often replacing alkaline cleaners




Q. My company faces a problem of having to change our alkaline electro and soak cleaners far more frequently than the manufacturers norms. We have reduced the concentration form the normal 8-12 oz/gal to around 6 oz/gal for financial reasons. We use these cleaners for all types of materials. Aluminum, steel, stainless steel, nickel alloys, brass and copper. We use the baths to remove oils, greases and compounds from our sanding, lapping and polishing operation.

We have a continuous filtration system running to remove particulate matter from the solution. We nor the manufacturer discover a reason why we need to replace these baths approximately every 2-3 weeks. Can anyone help?

Tim Hamlett
Tim Hamlett, CEF
- West Palm Beach, Florida, USA
2004


A. You haven't mentioned the type of soils you are trying to remove or how much the cleaner bath life is reduced. If you are trying to remove oil and grease (organic soils), I would expect bath life to be shorter when running at a lower concentration. By lowering the concentration, you may be reducing the cleaner's ability to saponify the oils, thus requiring more frequent replacement. Filtration will not remove most organics; it is there to remove particulate contamination.

James Totter
James Totter, CEF
- Tallahassee, Florida
2004


A. Hi Tim,

I think you may have answered your own question. If the supplier recommends to run the cleaner at 8-12 oz/gal and you're running it at 6 oz/gal, then it's no wonder that the cleaner appears to give out early.

If you need 8-12 oz/gal to get the work clean and you're running the same amount of work and the same amount of soil through the bath at 6 oz/gal, then the bath has 25-50% less active material to do the same cleaning job.

You say that your company has chosen to run the cleaner at 6 oz/gal for financial reasons. It sounds to me that this is a case of "pay me now or pay me later."

George Gorecki
- Naperville, Illinois
2004





Q. James and George,

I did say that we are removing oils, greases and buffing compounds from our sanding and polishing operations. We originally made up the bath at the manufacturer's recommended concentration of 8-12 oz/gal but the bath was still exhausted after 2-3 weeks. The manufacturer's expected life of this bath was several months. I too expect the bath to wear out more quickly at a lower concentration but the turn over is about the same depending on the work load. Could it be that running so many different base materials through the same bath is causing early failure? It really would not be cost effective for us to set up the same solution in different tanks for each base material.

Tim Hamlett
Tim Hamlett, CEF
- West Palm Beach, Florida, USA
2004


A. I hope you are not trying to remove soils common to aluminum in the same place you are removing soils common to steel. First, separate the aluminum from brass from steel. Then recognize that there is no such thing as a good aluminum cleaner (you cannot remove snot from a Kleenex !) So go to work on the SOURCE of the soil in the first place. There is no way to remove wax type, paraffin type soils from aluminum in an alkaline cleaner.

Design all you soak cleaner tanks with an overflow sump and slowly pump back into the cleaner side in a way to slowly and continuously skim the surface. Then occasionally take the floating soil out of the sump. Tell your cleaner tech service man (the salesman will not know) that you want a "separating formulation" for the soak cleaners. In over 50 years exposure to this industry and upon seeing the absolute worst oil removing problem, the cleaner change out frequency was reduced from weekly to BI-monthly by using separating formulations and an overflow sump.

Sump and skim is far more economical than filtration.

robert probert
Robert H Probert
Robert H Probert Technical Services
supporting advertiser
Garner, North Carolina
probertbanner
2004


A. Hi Tim,

When you say the bath is exhausted, what exactly does that mean? Are you maintaining product concentration through regular additions? In those 2-3 weeks of use, is the work getting clean?

One possible explanation is that you have the wrong product for the job. I would expect that your chemical supplier would know which product in their range is the right one for your application, but something like unexpected soils can cause surprises sometimes.

George Gorecki
- Naperville, Illinois
2004


A. Does your testing of your cleaning solution show a marked decrease in alkalinity or some other component that may be periodically boosted rather than dumping the tank?

James Chunn
- Theodore, Alabama
2004


A. Just a few thoughts on this problem. Firstly, it is unwise and not cost effective to carry out your own modifications to bespoke plating systems without doing it in conjunction with the supplier. Chemical suppliers do not give away their materials and you can be certain that what they put in is what is need to do the job properly. However, saying that, I am surprised the tanks give out so easily as even at half strength they should last more than a few weeks. I wonder is you have a leak somewhere and are unknowingly discharging the solutions to drain (or earth!?). As the volume goes down, you could be assuming the loss is evaporative and just top the tanks up with water. Alternatively, you could be losing the cleaner as drag out and again just topping the tanks with water. Either way, you will be diluting the tanks every time you top them up. The simplest way to check is to do routine (daily?) analyses of the tanks a monitor the concentrations. However, in my opinion, it is essential you follow the manufacturer's specifications and do not modify their processes as it will inevitably result in a false "cost saving" practice.

trevor crichton
Trevor Crichton
R&D practical scientist
Chesham, Bucks, UK
2004




Replace a degreasing cleaner with hot water?

Q. Hi. My pretreatment line has one spray degrease and two dip degreasing stages in pretreatment line. My question is what will be the effect if I replace 1st stage spray degrease by Hot water spray rinse? Please suggest.

sachin_gite
Sachin Gite
- Pune, Maharashtra, India
March 19, 2014


A. Hi Sachin. One of the minor memorable events of my consulting career was reading on a pollution prevention site the suggestion that the first stage soak cleaner be converted to just hot water, and passing the idea on to one of my clients who immediately implemented it. Well, you could probably safely make tea with that hot water, that's how little oil, grease and dirt came off in that first stage. It was beyond worthless.

There are two possible lessons from this. Either,
1). - it won't work, it's just a waste of time or
2). - try all ideas in the lab before committing to production.

Despite my own experience with this, I still suggest lesson 2 :-)

Luck and Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
March 2014


A. I agree with Ted. The hot water will help a little but it could cause huge problems compared to the current process. Testing would surely be needed.

blake kneedler
Blake Kneedler
Feather Hollow Eng. - Stockton, California
March 28, 2014




Soil Load/Bath Life Test for Soak Cleaners

Q. I have a hunch that our Metal Finishing department's time table for bath maintenance for their soak clean tanks are not appropriate/not efficient in ensuring effective cleaning. Does anybody out there have a method for a soil load test or similar to use for bath life? We use an Atotech product and they stated they do not use soil load tests. We run soak, electro, electro and the blame is always put on the electro-clean but I have a hunch it is actually the soak clean that is the problem.

Thank you,

Paul Hinton
Chemical Manager - Golden Valley, Minnesota USA
April 7, 2015


A. Put 50 ml of the cleaner solution in a 100 ml graduated cylinder. Slowly, carefully, add 50 ml of 50% sulfuric acid, stopper, invert, put on shelf overnight. Do this for a brand new solution and note the ml of organic float on top and multiply by 2. Then check your old solution the same way, subtract the above from the old, multiply by 2 - that is the "percentage of soil loading" which you take with a grain of salt until you have logged a few weeks, - then start using it as a dump or bleed/feed point.

robert probert
Robert H Probert
Robert H Probert Technical Services
supporting advertiser
Garner, North Carolina
probertbanner
April 7, 2015



!! As this site is used by many non-chemists who may not understand the implications, perhaps we should add to Robert's instructions.

First cool the cleaner. Add the acid very slowly and very carefully. The reaction generates significant heat, possibly enough to boil the mix. Measuring cylinders are not an easy container to mix in and are not all made of heat resisting glass. This is not what they are made for. It would be better to mix in a beaker [beakers on eBay or Amazon [affil links] and return to the cylinder after cooling.

This is one of those operations that should be done near a sink with running water and use eye protection.

geoff smith
Geoff Smith
Hampshire, England
April 8, 2015



thumbs up signThanks Geoff! The WWW is a great advance in a thousand ways, but one of its weaknesses -- which I've commented on here dozens of times -- is that it's a giant one-room schoolhouse where people are able to see pages that are not within their "grade level". Just because we can read about something on the internet doesn't mean that we are sufficiently trained and experienced to safely and successfully undertake it.

When it comes to surgery or building airliners, untrained people seem to realize that they are not doctors or aeronautical engineers ... but people who have once made a soup or cocktail sometimes consider themselves chemists :-)

Regards,

ted_yosem
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey




Alkaline bath changing frequency

Q. What is bath changing frequency of alkaline degreaser?

It may be 3 months or 6 months or depend on oil content?

After 3 months of working cleaning of tank and remove bottom sludge is necessary.

Sarang Kulkarni
- PIMPRI CHINCHWAD, MAHARASHTRA, India
June 15, 2019




A. Hi Sarang. There are 1001 alkaline cleaner formulations; different operating temperatures; different substrates and shapes; different soils, oils, and greases; different grease removal approaches. I think there is no way to proceed but to accumulate in-house data to guide in-house decisions on a dump schedule. But I think 6 months would be very long for most moderate to high production shops.

Regards,

ted_yosem
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
June 2019




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"