data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609bf/609bf7ec06bf67551c64cf7db86c75e1b2429ebb" alt="ted_yosem"
Curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e2f/26e2f7d702dd7be41aa0820ea5caf290b7b90d67" alt="finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry"
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing 1989-2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f77c/5f77ca5bdcdc1dd640bc1c826f3906846739a5b0" alt="mfhotline"
-----
Determining surface morphology with TEM
Instead of using SEM,what is the other equipment that I can use to see a cross section of thin film (<1 micron). My interest basically on multilayers within that film. Each layers calculated roughly about 5-6 nm. I'm done with SEM and now I'm trying to use TEM. any other equipment available for my interest?
Kamal HarmozaMSc student. - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2004
If I understand your question correctly, TEM may not be the most appropriate analytical method. I would investigate Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES), which is a similar technique to SEM using a Scanning Auger Microprobe (SAM) for elemental analysis. Other techniques with even greater resolution are Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS). The following link for the Center for Microanalysis of Materials located at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign provides descriptions of the various techniques: http://cmm.mrl.uiuc.edu/techniques/techn.htm
Toby PadfieldAutomotive module supplier - Michigan
2004
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread