No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Thin Dense Chrome Plate vs. Standard Chrome Plating




Please explain the difference between two platings - Thin Dense Chrome and standard Chrome Plate. Some platers do one but not the other. Both say the same Mil spec applies. AMSQQC320. The standard chrome plater I deal with says he can plate standard chrome plate .0002. Are there limits to how thick "Thin Dense Chrome" can be?

Is there a limit of how thin standard "Chrome Plate" can be? One plater told me that there are chemical differences between the two and the application is what determines the difference - if so, what are the criteria for each?

Thank You in advance for as much input as possible.

Nancy Boice
Purchasing Dept - Elmira, New York
2004


Nancy,

AMSQQC320 is a standard for hard chrome and this standard include also a flash chrome who is about 0,0002 inch this can be plated from a regular chrome solution but if you need a thicker chrome deposit so must this be chrome plated in a chrome solution who works in a higher temperature and also different additive than a regular chrome solution contents.

Regards

Anders Sundman
Anders Sundman
4th Generation Surface Engineering
Consultant - Arvika,
Sweden

2004


Difference between regular chrome and Thin Dense Chrome goes beyond what Specifications cover. It is related to chemistry, current density, temperature, etc. The deposit is also different regarding physical and mechanical properties, the later being basically harder and without cracks. It is, to my knowledge, a proprietary modification of a regular chrome bath.

Guillermo Marrufo
Monterrey, NL, Mexico
2004


I agree with the comments made by Mr. Marrufo: thin dense certainly has different characteristics. However, there seems to be a lack of support by platers as to a standard for this plating. It would seem that AMS 2438 should eliminate discussion although acceptance seems lacking. AMS2460 is the replacement for AMSQQC320, yet when I specify Class 1, Type I, .0001 thick with a nickel underplate I get nothing but "no bids." The parts I'm plating are steel and the prospect platers will only plate directly on the steel (regardless of the spec). Does anyone plate Class 1, Type I, and what is the proper standard to ensure I get thin dense and not just decorative bumper chrome?

Dan Drummond
- Ann Arbor, Michigan
May 11, 2009


AMS 2438 (Plating, Chromium, Thin, Hard, Dense Deposit) is a definitive specification for thin dense chrome. The replacement for AMSQQC320 is AMS2460 (Plating, Chromium) and seems more acceptable to platers as it doesn't carry the testing requirements defined in AMS 2438.

Dan Drummond
- Ann Arbor, Michigan
May 18, 2009


Does a layer of 5-7 microns (0.00025") of thin dense chrome can be a better alternative to a layer of 20-25 microns (0.009") of hard chrome plating in terms of wear resistance, lubricity and component life ?

Jignesh Panchal
Plating shop owner - India
May 19, 2011



May 19, 2011

Hi, Jignesh. I could certainly believe that a TDC coating could outlast a regular chrome plating 4X as thick, but I can't claim to know for sure. A factor that effects the life of chrome plating tremendously is the hardness of the underlying steel.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey


Thanks for your reply, Ted. As I understand from your comment, due to higher thickness, a layer of hard chrome would be considered better. However, similar thickness layer would definitely make TDC a better option. As such we are considering the base metal of steels of EN series (EN8 and EN19, and P20 in certain cases).

Jignesh Panchal
- India
May 20, 2011



We currently spec our plating requirement for thin dense chromium plating to is AMSQQC320, however I believe that AMS2460 supersedes this. However both specs are for general chromium plating. The relevant spec, I believe for thin dense chromium is AMS 2438 (thanks Dan Drummond). Now our plating supplier's standard conforms to AMS 2438A.

What is the difference between AMS 2438 and AMS 2438A?

Ian Armour
Metallurgist - Plymouth, United Kingdom
June 9, 2011

----
Ed. note Dec. 2022: The "A" means revision A, but we're up to F at last look :-)



Q. Does AMS2460 specify raw material specification for chrome? Can these raw material specifications be related to ISO or ASTM standards ?

Thanks for your help
Franck

Franck Loison
- Bordeaux, France


Hi Franck,

Unfortunately none of the AMS specs (2406, 2460, QQ-C-320) specify a raw material for the chrome.

Hope this helps.

Ian Armour
- Metallurgist, Plymouth, UK


none
adv.
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"