data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609bf/609bf7ec06bf67551c64cf7db86c75e1b2429ebb" alt="ted_yosem"
Curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e2f/26e2f7d702dd7be41aa0820ea5caf290b7b90d67" alt="finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry"
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing 1989-2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f77c/5f77ca5bdcdc1dd640bc1c826f3906846739a5b0" alt="mfhotline"
-----
Non wet on QFP package during reflow
2003
I have a customer complaining of random leads on a QFP package not reflowing during their reflow process. Pictures shows that there was sufficient solder paste on the PCB pad and there was no coplanarity issues. They reported a high fallout (as high as 30% on certain batches of material). Among actions taken so far are changing the solder paste which have reduced the fallout to 0.5% However there have been spikes off and on and customer are demanding for 0% fallout.
I am currently trying to simulate the problem using Ceramic Reflow Test Method, stated in the J-STD-002B. The spec. states that parts needs to be preconditioned (steam aged ) for 8 hrs on tin lead finishing products. However all my parts have failed this test. I am currently using ROL0 class type paste but the spec recommends using a ROL1 class paste. I will be testing this soon.
My questions are :
1. Is anyone familiar with ceramic plate test method?
2. Can anyone give some input on the problem on the problem that the customer is seeing (total non wet on random leads) I can provide photos of the failure mode if someone can shed some experience on this problem
Any help right now would be great.
Thanks,
Semiconductor manufacturer - Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread