No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

H2S resistance of nickel-plated aluminum




I saw in an earlier post that it was better to have 12% or higher phosphorous content for EN to have the best resistance to corrosion caused by H2S. My plater uses 9% phosphorus content in his EN process and doing a special run would be expensive. Can I get away with using 0.0015" EN with 9% phosphorous content for H2S resistance on Aluminum, or do I need to find another plater that uses more phosphorous?

John Buetow
- Boulder, Colorado, USA
2003


Well, that depends on what the cost of a failure or lots of failures is. If you are talking about down hole oil well equipment, you better go for the high P. Consistent 12-13% P is not an easy EN bath to operate compared to a 6-9%. I would want someone with experience with that bath doing it.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
2003



2003

This is not for down-hole equipment. This is for measuring moisture content of natural gas that may have a high H2S component. I know that we want to have thick plating, as I have had a problem recently where a standard 0.0005" electroless-nickel plating has had a pin-hole in it.

This allowed the moisture in the gas to attack the aluminum underneath and caused it to oxidize. I am not sure what else happened, because there was a black component as well as the standard white Al oxidation. Anyone have any ideas out there what the black stuff could be? Also, does anyone have any recommendations about what to put underneath the electroless Ni to protect the Al from oxidizing?
Or, will just a thicker Ni plating, say 0.002" be sufficient?

John Buetow
Boulder, CO USA


As you found out 0.0005 EN has pin holes. It will cost about twice as much to put on 0.0015 per side, but you should have less than 1% failure. I am not sure that 0.002 is that much better for your application. The black is probably aluminum sulfide, possibly nickel sulfide. As for underneath, there is nothing that is going to help you that is affordable. A good double zincating for adhesion should work with the 0.0015".

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
2003


High phos is less prone to pitting and should be less cathodic to aluminum. If you have bare or exposed aluminum in a corrosive environment the aluminum will become anodic to the nickel.

Todd Osmolski
- Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
2003




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"