No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing 1989-2024
  mfhotline


  -----

Removal of Chromium VI from wastewater




I am University of Vermont civil engineering student doing a project for a wastewater engineering class. We were given a list of constituents and there average concentrations from three wells and also discharge requirements. The main problem area is the amount of chromium VI (0.5 mg/L), and III (5 mg/L). We have to design a treatment process that will meet the discharge requirements which for the chrome are 0.1 mg/L. Any information on different treatment methods that are used with advantages and disadvantages would be very helpful. Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Matthew M [surname deleted for privacy by Editor]
- Burlington, Vermont 2003



2003

See letter 18899. Of the conventional methods, I suggest chemical reduction using sodium hydrosulfite this on eBay or Amazon zincaffil links] , + coagulant such as Fe+3, pH adjust, + polymer flocculent, settling and filtering. Use about 2:1 Fe:Cr and a final pH of 8.5-8.75, and the co-precipitation should give a final [Cr] < 0.1 ppm.

For the given low influent levels, electrocoagulation (electrochemical reduction + coagulation) is probably a viable method as well. The least expensive plates (Fe) should give the lowest effluent levels.

Both of these methods have the advantage of not requiring acidification in order to accomplish the Cr+6 reduction; thus, no acid metering pump and less alkali [Ca(OH)2, Mg(OH)2 or NaOH] are needed.

Ken Vlach [deceased]
- Goleta, California

contributor of the year Finishing.com honored Ken for his countless carefully researched responses. He passed away May 14, 2015.
Rest in peace, Ken. Thank you for your hard work which the finishing world, and we at finishing.com, continue to benefit from.






(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2025 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"