No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Alternatives to Ivadizing




We currently make motors that operate in a salt water environment, underwater. We Ivadize and then paint them. Is this overkill for corrosion resistance, galvanic issues, etc. or is there a cheaper and more available way to have equal protection.

Sid Tryzbiak
- Tulsa, Oklahoma
2003



First of two simultaneous responses

With the information given, no one can answer it. A guess is that 0.001" of high phos EN might work. Possibly 0.0015 of mid phos might do. Simulated lab testing will give a better answer. Field testing is the only real answer.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
2003



Second of two simultaneous responses

It's not clear to me if the motors are made of aluminum, steel, or a mix.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2003


The motor has a cast aluminum commutator cap and a a cast aluminum nose cap. The center section is steel which has magnets attached inside.

Sid Tryzbiak
- Tulsa, Oklahoma
2007


Because this is a mix of metals in a very corrosive environment, I do not think any organic coating alone will prove sufficient. The Ivadizing you do before painting means that if the paint is scratched, the scratched area has the sacrificial protection of the Ivadized pure aluminum coating to protect it.

Jim is right that electroless nickel might do the job and be more available, but considering the rampant corrosion pervasive on salt water boats, and speaking as a former recreational boater, customers would have a hard time believing that the corrosion resistance of your motors is "too good".

Mooney's Law: Cost reduction programs are always ultimately a failure because they are proceed from the premise that the quality is too good or at least good enough, which is never the case and never will be (only personal opinion, but based on 40 years of diverse industrial and management consulting experience which never once disproved it). So look for better surface finishes and they may end up being cheaper. Good luck.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2007




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"