Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing since 1989
-----
sulphate Nickel vs. Sulfamate Nickel
Q. I am working on a project for mechanical design for a wireless telecommunication component. I intend to use nickel electroplating finish. Can anyone kindly tell me what's the difference between sulfamate nickel and sulphate nickel in mechanical/electrical properties, such as corrosion resistance, solderability, conductance, ductility, surface adhesion etc.? Thanks a lot!
David Lin- Laurel, Maryland
2002
A. As a general rule, sulfamate nickel is used for engineering purposes and electroforming while sulphate nickel is used for decorative brightwork.
Again, it's a general rule, and many shops will have only a single solution for both types of work. But the sulfamate nickel is generally an easier match if the component will be deformed or soldered and the sulphate nickel an easier match for brightest appearance.
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2002
A. As Ted says, sulphate nickel is mainly decorative and sulphamate is engineering nickel. However, before nickel sulphamate was available the only engineering nickels were chloride or sulphate based. Sulphamate can deposit much lower stressed nickel than all the others and has the advantage it does not necessarily need additives, although in reality, to get neutral or compressive nickel, you do need some. It happily works at lower temperatures and also doesn't need chloride in the electrolyte if you use sulfur nickel anodes. I am not aware of any corrosion properties, although I believe there are claims that sulphamate produces a slightly harder deposit. I cannot, however, verify this.
Trevor Crichton
R&D practical scientist
Chesham, Bucks, UK
2002
adv.
"The Sulfamate Nickel How-To Guide"
by David Crotty, PhD
& Robert Probert
published Oct. 2018
$89 plus shipping
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread