No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Static Rinse or Constant Overflow




My question is regarding the rinsing method in a Chemical Conversion coating line. Following immersion in both the alkaline and deox solutions we are currently immersing in a static rinse followed by a spray rinse. The static rinse is tested weekly and usually requires changing about every three weeks. We occasionally have problems with corrosion and adhesion testing and are looking at the static rinse as one of the possible culprits. We would like to find out more about processing with rinse tanks that constantly add fresh water. Is there a general rule of thumb as to the amount of water to be added say per hour. I realize there are a lot of variables, i.e. the amount of processing, size of parts, etc., so if more info is needed I can supply it.

Thanks,

Todd Sjerven
- Sidney, BC, Canada
2002



Hi Todd,

You are correct, it is difficult to say for certain what a satisfactory overflow rate should be. But anything you do to improve the quality of your rinses will improve the overall quality of your process. IMO, overflowing is a must. Remember, water is your cheapest chemical.

George Gorecki
- Naperville, Illinois
2002



Any time you run the capacity of a chemical process to exhaustion instead of employing bleed-and-feed, you are adding an unnecessary variable that you need to track. If you are quality conscious, overflowing rinses (bleed & feed) will be less effort in the long run.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2002



Somewhere in the archives of this site (letter 13503), there is a graph or chart for quick and easy determination of the extent of rinse water contamination, using amount of carry-over and volume of dilution and flow rates and so on.

It's not my field, but I'm sure I recall someone posting such a chart, and Ted commenting on it.

Bill Reynolds
Bill Reynolds [deceased]
consultant metallurgist - Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
We sadly relate the news that Bill passed away on Jan. 29, 2010.

2002



At www.metalfinishing.com there is a paper related to how to calculate the overflow required to maintain the rinsing water with low contamination.

Guillermo Castorena
- Mexico
2002

----
Ed. note: The Metal Finishing Guidebook is no longer available on line, but follow the link to learn about hard copy.



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"