No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Galvanic Problems - Zinc substituted for Cadmium




2002

I have an assembly, primarily carbon steel/stainless steel, that has 2 parts (HR steel) currently cadmium plated (.0002"). My plan is to substitute the Cadmium plate with a Zinc plate (ASTM B633 SC-2, Type 2 yellow chromate). However, the issue was raised about Galvanic reaction concerns.

Everything else being the same (no galvanic cell problems to date), would switching to zinc possibly introduce previously unseen galvanic corrosion problems?

Zinc is more anodic than Cadmium but I want to be sure that I won't actually make things worse by introducing this change. I'm just looking for some expert opinion on the matter.

Thanks for the help!

Brian Bukoski
- Erie, Pennsylvania



Hello Brian!

If you take a look at MIL-STD-889 (available from the DoD at astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/) you'll notice that there is no difference between rows B (zinc) and C (cadmium). This means that at least as far as military aerospace is concerned, there's no real difference between the two coatings from a galvanic standpoint. If you didn't have a problem before, you won't have a problem now. If you had to take some mitigating measures before, you got to take them now.

Trouble is so much depends on the specific application that these charts can only guide you. For instance, if you have a lot of zinc coating touching a little area of steel, then there won't be much in the way of galvanic corrosion. If you have a lot of steel touching only a bit of zinc, in the presence of seawater, then you'll quickly corrode the zinc.

Good luck!

lee gearhart
Lee Gearhart
metallurgist - E. Aurora, New York
2002



First the standard disclaimer: you may get food for thought here, but you don't get expert opinion free of charge over the Internet from a stranger who has never even seen the details of the situation first hand. You won't introduce any galvanic problems elsewhere, just that the plating may corrode faster since the zinc is more active. You may wish to use a heavier zinc plating, or an alloy plating like zinc-nickel from which you can obtain an activity level similar to cadmium.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2002


Thanks for the help everyone. I appreciate the responses. Mr. Mooney: You should edit the standard disclaimer. From my experience, opinions are always free, it's the facts that can cost you. Thanks for everything!

Brian Bukoski
- Erie, Pennsylvania



Galvanically similar, however, the corrosion products are quite different. Cad product is far less voluminous and used to be favored over zinc in electronics for this reason.

milt stevenson jr.
Milt Stevenson, Jr.
Syracuse, New York
 



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"