No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Galling of 718 threads in non-permanent connections



 

I have seen references to using copper coating on threads in order to reduce the galling seen in applications which require a 718 to 718 permanent connections.

I am looking for any recommendations on connections which are not permanent or even near permanent. As in connections which may be made up and broken hundreds of times in a given lifetime.

Gary Martin
- Sugar Land, Texas



For plating of hardware for non-galling, I believe the gold standard is silver not copper. But if hardware must be disassembled and assembled hundreds of times, I would think that an inherently non-galling substrate would be near the top of the priority list.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
 



You're right in that copper coating and API modified dope is used on premium threaded connections made from "stainless" materials (Using stainless as a generic term for duplex & Inconels etc). By far the greatest amount is plated on couplings, hangers and pup joints, etc. However typically to qualify copper coating on a particular thread type, the industry has seemed to settle on achieving 10 make and breaks using min/max tolerances on the boxes and pins (i.e., max thread interference conditions) Which is relevant to these applications when you consider that pipe and hangers etc are only generally broken out during work overs or if there is a problem. If you're talking about premium thread type connections. I doubt whether copper and dope would withstand "hundreds of make and breaks". It looks like a test program is the only answer to assess any likely candidate coatings. For instance Electroless Nickel/PTFE composites

Regards,

Richard Guise
- Lowestoft, U.K.



Years ago an Aerospace company that I worked for used a lot of copper based "anti seize" on 718 when parts went into the oven for a "restrained " heat treatment. I can not speak to its use in the field.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida



We have coated many 718 parts in your particular industry with Nedox CR+ coating. It is a nickel based alloy that is infused with a polymer. We have also run Nedox against Nedox without galling

Corey Wesnitzer
- Arlington, Texas



2006

Sugar Blasting mating parts extends the life of screwed connections by roughening the surfaces. The roughened surface "holds" the pipe dope so the mating parts do not meet.

Robbie Robbins

Robbie Robbins
- Houston, Texas USA




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"