No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Parts returned for Plating too thin




We are a sheet metal manufacturing company. Parts were returned to us for incomplete plating, plating that is not thick enough. The standard on the drawing is Type 2 (gold). SC2 class B. Minimum .0003". The part being plated is a 22.720 channel with thru holes one side of the flanges. Can this be done? Maybe this specification is unreal and cannot be done. The amount of plating is .00023 on the outside of the channel on the inside is .00011. Can you give the info. The metal is cold roll steel and is 0.105 thick.

Shirley Marsh
metal products - Santa Rosa, California


A. Your plater should be able to produce a minimum thickness of 0.0003 inch gold. You don't say what specification is being sited on the drawing but Mil-G-45204 gives the following information: Type II is 99.0 gold purity, Grade A through D refers to deposit hardness, Class 00 through 6 refers to thickness (Class 4 is 0.0003 inch thick minimum). Also, unless the drawing specifies otherwise, only surfaces which can be touched by sphere 0.75 inch diameter need meet the minimum thickness.

Neil Bell
Red Sky Plating
supporting advertiser
Albuquerque, New Mexico
redsky


A. Hi. My guess is that Shirley means to talk about zinc plating with a 'gold' colored chromate, perhaps ASTM B633, rather than gold plating. Regardless, Neil's point that it is customary for a minimum thickness specification to only apply to areas touchable by a 3/4" diameter ball remains a good one.

It should be relatively easy to increase the plating thickness somewhat, but the approximate 3:1 thickness ratio between the thickest plating on the part and the thinnest is not real surprising. And if you truly need .0003" minimum, it may be worthwhile to improve the racking, switch to a type of plating with more even throwing power, or consider auxiliary anodes -- because .0009" on the thick areas is probably more than you would reasonably want.

Good luck.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
December 19, 2012




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"