data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609bf/609bf7ec06bf67551c64cf7db86c75e1b2429ebb" alt="ted_yosem"
Curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e2f/26e2f7d702dd7be41aa0820ea5caf290b7b90d67" alt="finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry"
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing 1989-2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f77c/5f77ca5bdcdc1dd640bc1c826f3906846739a5b0" alt="mfhotline"
-----
Anodize/plating for Al to resist bromides
Is anyone aware of an anodize or plating for aluminum (6061-T651) that would resist the corrosive effects of bromides, specifically HgBr and CsBr. So far I have eliminated a hard chrome anodize and a nickel plating. Interestingly enough, a thin film sulfuric acid anodize has held up quite well, but I have not tested long term exposure as of yet. We are trying to reduce cost in one of our assemblies by eliminating the use of SS.
Thanks,
Marty Verbic- Urbana, Illinois, USA
First of two simultaneous responses --
High phosphorous electroless nickel plating will work well for this application.
Todd Osmolski- Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Second of two simultaneous responses --
Chrome absolutely would not work. Electroplated nickel probably would not be a lot better. Did you try electroless nickel? about 0.001"? That should have worked. If anodize works, I would look for someone that would run it at 65F and about 20 volts. It will be a lot thicker and denser. You might give hard anodizing a try-Say 0.0005 to 0.001 per side.It is much denser.
James Watts- Navarre, Florida
Check out hard anodising (no seal) followed by thermoplastic impregnation into the pores.
John Tuohy- Ireland
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread