No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Stainless Steel Mirror Finish on Small, Mass Produced Parts




 

We have contracted with a company in China to mass manufacture a small and inexpensive stainless steel encased electromechanical medical device ($5 per device to manufacturer). We have specified mirror finish on 316 stainless. The parts to be polished are essentially cylinders closed at one end, about .25" diameter, .50" length, .025" wall thickness, only the exterior needs to be polished.

They have been unable to achieve mirror finish via tumbling with some sort of ceramic triangles. I assume that this is too abrasive to give mirror finish. I have heard of the use of (1) tumbling with walnut shell media this on eBay or Amazon [affil links] , (2) vibrator with corncorb and burnishing paste, (3) electropolish, (4) chemical polish without electrodes.

I have several questions:

1. Which of these techniques is most promising?
2. What are the relative costs of each?
3. Electropolish would seem to be best for several reasons, not least the reduction of microbial growth on electropolished surfaces. Is it practical for such small, inexpensive parts?
4. Are there any other techniques that we've overlooked?

Thanks.

Eric Klein
- Mountain View, California



You are correct about supplier problem. However, what is more important here is, what is the existing surface finish of the part? If you are starting out with a rough surface finish, over 35 RMS, you may need a multi-step process. Because of the size of your part, my guess you are more likely around 22 to 25 RMS. That means that if the part is to be used in medical applications, you still need to reduce or improve the RMS down to at least 12 to 16 RMS before you should consider plating processes. A fine cut ceramic or LWII composition might get you down to 16-18 RMS. From there, there are options, but I prefer dry organic processing. A dry organic abrasive might improve RMS to about 10-12 and from there a fine organic polishing mix might get you a 4 to 8 RMS. Time cycles depend on equip.used. Please advise if you need more info.

tony kenton
AF Kenton
retired business owner - Hatboro, Pennsylvania
 




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"