data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609bf/609bf7ec06bf67551c64cf7db86c75e1b2429ebb" alt="ted_yosem"
Curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e2f/26e2f7d702dd7be41aa0820ea5caf290b7b90d67" alt="finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry"
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing 1989-2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f77c/5f77ca5bdcdc1dd640bc1c826f3906846739a5b0" alt="mfhotline"
-----
Poor throw in trivalent chrome plating bath
Having troubles with coverage in trivalent chrome bath from MacDermid (ex. Canning-Gumm). Boric acid is at vendor recommended level. Using specialized vendor-offered anodes. The majority if parts are large faucets or similar. Brass/Copper as substrates. Bright Nickel undercoat. pH 3.5 is found to be working pretty well, but poor coverage on LCD areas is an on-going problem. Any ideas?
Elena Bliemel- USA
The most likely cause of poor throw in that bath is contamination by metallic impurities, but you will need a full analysis. Also if you are using the membrane anodes, you need to keep them maintained so they do not leak.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f235/1f23568b359c58c2b849c81aa4469215ff0e7872" alt="tom pullizzi monitor"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd60f/dd60f16769958ea27908b178d582dd84187c11b8" alt="tom pullizi signature"
Tom Pullizzi
Falls Township, Pennsylvania
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread