No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Edge effects in nickel sulphamate electroplating




Q. We are plating a flat surface with sharp corners in a nickel sulphamate solution. The desired plate thickness is 8-10 mils (0.008"). Unfortunately, the deposit tends to build up to 12-14 mils at the edges, as a result of the higher current density there. We need to eliminate this excess build-up.

Due to the part geometry and other requirements changes in the masking are not allowed.

I need to identify a chemical additive to the nickel-sulphamate bath which would eliminate the edge effects.

I am guessing that the desired additive would have to reduce the current exchange density (i.e. make the surface more passive) in order to make diffusion the rate-limiting step.

The surface to be plated is flat and the aspect ratio is zero.

Thanks.

Chris Nenov
- cgtc
1998


A. Hi Chris. I hope you WANT to eliminate the excess buildup rather than NEED to! After all, virtually everyone wants uniform plating thickness, and virtually nobody gets it.

If you can't mask the parts, then racking them in a self-shielding fashion or using non-conductive shields or even current thieves will help some. Proprietary brighteners will work *to some extent* via the mechanism you mention.

In general, you want your plating conditions to limit ion mobility in order to starve the high current density areas, as well. Usually this means plate fast, keep the temperature low, the concentration low, and minimize agitation--but these are just the theoretical directions and may not always represent practical solutions.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
1997


A. Using low PH (3.8-4), agitation, at least 55 °C and a proprietary additive has to solve your problem. (Is your Ni conc. in the solution high enough?) Sara

sara michaeli
sara michaeli signature
Sara Michaeli
Tel-Aviv-Yafo, Israel
1998


A. Butadiene Diol is an excellent additive for your problem.

I also recommend to give a spin motion to the part if is possible and conform the anode to avoid build up in the corner.

Gabriel Schonwald
Bnei Berak, Israel
1998




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"