No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Hydrogen embrittlement relief by oil bath instead of air




Q. We would like to subcontract hard chromium plating to a company which does embrittlement relief using an oil bath, but we noted that the applicable AMS spec requires the use of an air atmosphere. Other chrome specs with which we are familiar do not have this limitation. Can you think of a specific reason for this limitation? Is it likely that our customer can be convinced to waive this point and accept the use of the oil bath?

Aryeh Asher
- Ashkelon, Israel
1998


A. Aryeh,
Specifications are written by people based on their knowledge, experience and literature. Most people would not want to use oil since it is a mess to clean up afterwards. I can not think of any other reason why it is not a listed option. Your customer is the only one that can tell you if he will allow it. Literature is not going to be much of a help since nearly everyone uses a furnace.
My experience with hydrogen embrittlement is keep the acid dip as short as possible, get it into the plating tank immediately and bake the part as soon as possible after it comes out of the tank.
We used 20 minutes as a goal on cad and 1 hour for chrome that had been waxed, (they were large parts). No failures.
If your customer balks, you might try doing notch bars at higher than required pull or for longer as a technical "push".
Finally, I do not like oil for a bake because he will undoubtedly go in hot or let parts set a long time. Heavy builds on large parts will expand differently as they heat up differently and quite rapidly. I think you will get failures from time to time. Compare the coefficients of expansion of the plate and the parent metal. Do not forget to include dimensions, as the bigger the part, the worse the problem. There are compensations that can be made to reduce this like a very slow immersion.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
1998



Q. Some more details are provided here:

We subcontract hard chromium plating as per SAE-AMS2406H and would like to use a subcontractor who built his line to conform to FED QQ-C-320 . This facility is equipped with an oil bath for performing hydrogen embrittlement relief. Unlike the QQ spec, the AMS spec specifically indicates (para. 3.2.2) that parts must be heated in air.

Can you think of a reason for this limitation? It is hard for me to believe that oil can impede the diffusion of hydrogen from the parts. If there is no technical reason for it, do you think that we have grounds for trying to convince our customer (aerospace) to waive this requirement?

Thank you.

Regards,

Aryeh Asher
- Ashkelon, Israel
1998




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"