Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ

The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  

Passivation of stainless steel hypotubes

My company currently uses passivation on our hypotubes*. We use a 4 second rinse and a 20 minute bath in 20% nitric acid. The theory is that this will remove tramp metals, cutting oils and possibly leave a stable oxidized layer on the inner surface of the stainless steel hypo tube. We really are not sure if using the nitric acid is really doing anything.

What I would like to know is how effective is passivation, is there any standards dealing with the process, and why it is done.

If you can help me I would appreciate a reply

* -- a hypotube is made in the same manner as a hypodermic needle but it's used in a catheter, with saline being the only fluid in contact with the inner surface.

You have explained passivation quite well, Martin, except with regard to "cutting oils" -- passivation is not a substitute for cleaning; rather the parts need to be well cleaned before passivation.

Yes, it works. However, quoting the ASM Metals Handbook, "In most natural environments, stainless steels will remain in a passive state . . . Change to an active state occurs only where chloride concentrations are high, as in seawater . . ." So, perhaps with saline solution it doesn't actually achieve much, but it is a very accepted and generally useful practice for the removal of tramp iron from the surface, and probably should be continued.

I would suggest that you get a copy of ASTM A380 . However, there probably are additional ASTM or other specs related specifically to your product line; for example, I know that there are specific specs for surgical implants (ASTM F86, for example), so I presume that there probably are others that are applicable to you.

www.finishing.com is made possible by supporting advertisers ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText