|
|
![]() (Cycles thru suppliers) |
|
![]() |
Nitric Passivation of 17-4 Wire EDM surfaceAugust 26, 2008 We are passivating 17-4 SS parts which have been wire edm'ed,
which leaves a recast layer on the surface where the spark contacts
the part. If we try to remove the recast layer by glass bead blast
(which we typically do to remove scale from heat treat) and then
passivate in nitric (per ASTM
A-967 [link is to spec at TechStreet] Nitric 2 and 4 - we do
both), we end up with a very noticeable yellow tint on the wired
surfaces. Many of our wired surfaces are too difficult to reach by
brush/wheel methods to remove the recast. Miles KB
September 12, 2008 As a follow up to this question, we've had some success leaving
the parts in the acid longer (as much as an hour). ASTM A967 does not
seem to state a maximum time, only a minimum. Would leaving parts in
for double the minimum time cause any issues? Miles KB
September 21, 2008 Miles, you may want to run a test lot using a stainless media. Depending on the recast area to be cleaned of the spark contact, you may want to try a cut wire shot if you need to remove material or a conditioned cut wire shot if just a burinish "peened" clean up area is desired. The cut wire media will last 10,000x longer than the glass bead, so if a dedicated small blast cabinet can be set up, it may prove very cost effective. Tim Deakin
September 29, 2008 Thanks for the suggestion Tim. Unfortunately, we are held to the glass bead media by customer requirements. I may look into the conditioned shot a little more though to see how well it removes the re-cast, and follow it with a glass bead blast for the final finish. Thanks. Miles KB
![]() |
Save
This Page (why?) - Home - ©1995-2008 finishing.com